Disaster Artist

"Lanchuan Perspective", 100%, "Unparalleled! Unbelievable! Full of praise!"

"Screen", 100%, "a story so cold, so cruel and so dramatic, but presented in such a light, so dark and so humorous way, the shocking thunder effect didn't start to reverberate until after the movie was over. Doubt, this is a work that makes people breathless."

"Premiering", one hundred percent, "Lu Qian is so bold, so flamboyant, so wise and so calm - he believes in the audience's IQ and also in the audience's 'movie sense' aesthetic, and elegantly and sharply combines such a The story comes out and it's hard to believe it's just one movie, because when you watch it, it's like you're watching four movies, and yet they all come together so seamlessly, and you don't want to miss any of them."

"Film Club", 100%, "hats off! A standing ovation! Lu Qian took the risk of choosing Zhang Benqing and Pei Chenglin as the protagonists of this work, and used his own flawless inspiration to create such a work, 'Love' proves that How a top director turned the impossible into a perfect dislocation."

"Spotlight", 100%, "It's hard to imagine that I'm going to say this, but Lu Qian once again showed his mastery and proved that he is definitely not a fleeting meteor, this is a work worthy of entering the cinema, and it is A work worth watching again and again. From 'tourist' to 'lover', Lu Qian knows what he's doing."

"Entertainment Weekly", 100%, "Lu Qian made a black comedy, and it was brilliant - this is not news, but Lu Qian made a black comedy that was serious and entertaining and set off a brainstorm, It deserves a standing ovation. Get your popcorn ready, audience."

Full marks, full marks, full marks.

Even in the midst of praise, the full score is still very terrifying, showing the strength of the movie in a destructive manner.

Among them, the "Lanchuan Perspective" puts forward a very interesting point. They believe that Lu Qian is bolder and more presumptuous than the "tourist" period, and even in the "lover" lens, he "provoked" the audience many times. , both Ai Qing and Wang Si are provoking the moral bottom line of mainstream society.

"However, instead of the repulsion and disgust of the heartburn, there is a guilty pleasure."

In the film review, "Lanchuan Perspective" believes that Lu Qian did this on purpose, as if he could see Lu Qian's sly smile hiding behind the camera.

Perhaps, "Lanchuan Perspective" has revealed a secret: why so many people don't like "lovers", more than "tourists"——

It is precisely because of Lu Qian's "smartness and cunning" that he did not hide it.

As a result, a small number of high-ranking film critics felt that they were insulted and attacked, and Lu Qian's "condescending, arrogant and proud" face stung them.

"Independent Movie", Fifty Points, "When watching the movie, we can even see Lu Qian's proud face hidden behind the characters and script, but the cruelty of reality is that there is a gap between cleverness and great wisdom, forever Insurmountable, a film like this will never be called a masterpiece."

"Film Circle", Fifty Points, "Looks smart but is actually stupid. The 'tourist''s exploration of the psychological level is completely lost when he comes to the 'lover'. Lu Qian very skillfully hides the psychological level waves in the sharp editing and editing. The camera movement, however, still can't hide the psychological thriller's degeneration to the level of physical stimulation - the blood, the fruit juice, proving that this movie is just poor popcorn."

"Times", Fifty Points, "From the perspective of film production, 'Love' has created a huge splash, and Lu Qian has once again proved that he can be an excellent suspense/thriller director; but from the film itself, 'Love' seems to have a dazzling and ups and downs plot, but it fails to present a psychological impact at all, which is a huge step backward compared to 'Tourists'."

Embarrassed, regretful, cursed.

In the middle review, you can see a series of sharp comments, criticized mercilessly, with fierce words and clear opinions, which are obviously not bad reviews but more deafening than bad reviews.

These comments have broken a key -

In "Tourists", the collisions at the physical level are all foreshadowing the turning point at the psychological level, and the flow of emotion and psychology can be seen in every dialogue and conflict.

But in "Love", the excessive turning, drama, and bloodshed largely cover up the psychological waves.

Lu Qian has realized this, accurately and neatly grasped the arc of transformation of the two characters, and presented them through the performance of the two scenes, but he still could not resist the "dramatic" destruction, and finally Lu Qian used the physical level. The collision to cover up the weakness at the psychological level——

Running, slitting throats, hammering, fainting, clashing...

The existence of these "actions" are all superficial procedures to show psychological transformation through actions, because the stronger the visual and auditory impact, the easier it is for the audience to be immersed in the sensory experience, thus ignoring the resonance at the psychological level and being Involved in an image storm.

Therefore, the interpretation space of "lover" is far inferior to that of "tourist".

This is a step backward.

I have to admit that film critics are still professionals after all. In a word, looking at the essence through the phenomenon, accurately analyzing and grasping Lu Qian's careful thinking in the creative process, after all, they can't hide it from them.

When Blue Whale Pictures read these comments, they expressed their concerns. Will this affect the follow-up promotion of the movie?

Qu Yushi seemed very calm, to be precise, he was a bit dumbfounded.

"Have you forgotten? The director said that this time the film was originally released as a commercial work. We gave up the screening and went straight to the public release stage because of the commercial nature of 'lover'."

In other words, Lu Qian knew this clearly and did not shy away from it. If film critics think that such criticism can hit Lu Qian, then they are too naive~www.readwn.com~ Not to mention, Don't ignore the fact that -

Even though the complaints were so violent, the film critics still gave "medium reviews" instead of "bad reviews", which also proved that deep down they still affirmed Lu Qian's work.

As a commercial film, these "criticisms" are, to some extent, an affirmation, because "lovers" are not as profound as "tourists". Instead, they are more entertaining and attractive to the general public. Power is naturally higher.

This is a good thing.

If you look at the other positive reviews, it is clear at a glance. After all, there are only ten middle reviews, and all the others are full of praise.

Since the birth of Lu Qian, it seems that it has become a habit to swipe the screen with "praise". It is because of this that Lu Qian's soaring speed is so fast, but seeing the "standard ending" again is still amazing. The young director is currently in the midst of a creative blowout in his career.

"Love" may be an attempt to collide business and art, and it is also something that Lu Qian has never tried before, and this step seems to be quite successful...?