I Make Games To Scare Crying Players

Game evaluation media, as the name suggests, is to rate games.

But this scoring is not easy.

Different from the ratings of players, the ratings of the media will more or less affect the sales and reputation of the game.

Once a certain game gets a high score, in addition to its excellent quality, the following days are preparations for winning prizes. Because the sales will definitely be high!

And if a game gets a low score, in addition to being lost to everyone because of poor quality, the sales volume will probably not meet the publisher's expectations.

Therefore, when this scoring behavior can gradually affect the market and sales, the money transaction will be born from this.

Your game is bad and you want to rate it?

It doesn't matter, if the money is in place, I will give you a high score, black and red are also red.

Your game is so good that you want to rate it?

Do you know what I mean? (rubs fingertips)

What? You don't understand?

I'm sorry, you can't play this game.

Your game is quite average and you want to rate it?

Do you know the rules? (crazy hint)

What? Not enough money?

I will give you a low score first, and we will make up a reason to change the high score when the money is in place.

Don't worry, don't worry that no one will buy it, there are many players, and there are many kinds of grievances.

As a result, in the history of games, there have been many cases where good games were given low scores, or low scores were changed to high scores in the middle of the game.

As for bad games with high scores, it's rare.

Obviously, the media like them want to show some face.

In other words, act it out, don't be so obvious.

Then, when this industry was born, media organizations also began to pop up one by one.

Make money, don't be fooled.

Therefore, the number of evaluation agencies in the world can be said to be too numerous.

But if they are classified by 'professional' and 'authority', there are so many, it will become a drop in the bucket.

And this part is almost all foreign evaluation agencies.

In China, there is only one, and it is in the form of self-media, and its status is in the range of 'too many'.

Therefore, no matter how objective and professional this self-media evaluation agency is.

It's not enough for players to have a reference.

However, CA, the world's largest and highest-traffic American evaluation agency, is actually the primary reference object for the player community.

Of course, that was once.

The current CA has become less professional.

Because they have repeatedly overturned in recent years.

There were even two industry jokes about "interns scoring wrongly".

In fact, everyone understands that the so-called interns' scoring is just an excuse.

The real situation is that the money is not in place, and I was given a low score.

However, even if it was a joke, CA still relies on its own qualifications and connections to sit firmly on the throne of the world's number one authority, and its position has not been shaken so far.

Even if players gradually stop using their ratings as a reference, it doesn't matter to them.

Business, as long as you have money.

Players don't care, can you make money for me?

Therefore, with more and more CA rollover incidents (not enough money), the phrase "CA is a joke" has been widely circulated in domestic player circles.

But now, for the game "Control Failure", players are still looking forward to what the major media will think of it.

After all, they are still very concerned about this domestic game that is going global.

After all, the previous "Mountain of the Sky" had a good reputation and sales.

So who has a higher evaluation of "Control Failure" than the previous game?

Therefore, as the vanguard of game information, the Fourth Natural Disaster Club posted the reviews of major media organizations that night, so that players can see them at a glance.

The first is CA, which will never be absent. They gave "Control Failure" a score of 5.9?

Al?

How fat four! ?

No 6 points?

Previously, "Mountain of the Sky" scored a high score of 9.8!

Why is "Control Failure" only scored 5.9 this time?

While the players were stunned, they quickly looked at the specific evaluation content.

advantage:

+ Graphics quality is very cutting edge

+ always tense atmosphere

+Super high and incredible degree of freedom

+Character performances are fantastic

shortcoming:

-

Monster AI is a pain in the ass -

The map is too wide and not very exploratory

-

The presence of a weapon does not demonstrate its importance

-

Random events are frequent and tiresome

-

The element of stealth is greater than the element of survival -

easy to get lost

Rating: 5.9 (average)

Ah this

No way?

The only game overturned?

Game crashed?

NO!

Players who didn't believe in evil rolled their mouses one after another, looking down at CA's comments.

Sure enough, under the rating, there are long word comments.

Simply put, it means:

The game is doing well, but I'm tired of playing it.

The monster AI is too high, and the whole game is exhausting.

The atmosphere is rendered well, and the entertainment experience is boring.

The roads open in all directions and exploration is nauseating.

There are different types of firearms, all of which have the same effect.

It was originally a survival game, but in the end only body skills remained.

The plot is jerky and obscure, and the experience is too desperate.

The essence of the game deviates, and it should pay attention to feelings!

Wow -!

Unexpectedly, CA actually commented like this, the game really crashed?

Or is the only game publisher, Unlimited Online Entertainment, not giving enough money?

Wait a moment!

Will the game really crash?

Because this time the production team's trailer is a CG trailer, not a real machine trailer, will it really crash and I'm sorry to release it?

but it shouldn't

They have made a development team that dominates the horror market like "Mountain in the Sky", how could they overturn in "Control Failure"?

Could it be that the management is in disarray?

Or is the development process blocked?

In short, some unsure players immediately rolled the wheel and looked at the next media comment.

As a result, this directly made the players unable to deal with it.

The second organization is JM, which is as famous as CA, but with a lower traffic flow.

They once gave "Sky Mountain" a high score of 9.7.

Now give "Control Failure" a .10?

ah?

I am not wrong, right?

The players in front of the screen immediately rubbed their eyes, and then took a closer look.

That's right, 10 points!

JM, who is as famous as CA, actually gave "Control Failure" a perfect score of 10!

In other words, this is actually a masterpiece!

Players immediately looked down to see JM's detailed comments.

advantage:

+ The VR picture is so real that you feel like you are there

+Very modern industrial sci-fi scene design

+ Any item you see can be picked up

+ The monster's AI logic is so intelligent that it is unimaginable

+The map has various details and is highly exploratory

+ Very impressive random events

+Perfect and realistic character plot performance

+ The presence of firearms is not strong, reflecting the importance of survival

+ Radar map is useful, it is not easy to get lost

+ Stealth mechanism makes the game more scary

+The music style is very suitable for the occasion and can mobilize people's hearts

shortcoming:

-

The ability of the wandering monster is unknown, and it is easy to die when it is first encountered

-

The introduction document of the detention room is a bit professional and esoteric, and it is not easy to remember

-

The synthesis formula of a certain mechanical equipment is confusing, without detailed description-

Too many key cards -

Backpack capacity is too small

Rating: 10 (Masterpiece)

Brief comments:

'By far, this is the most shocking horror game I've ever played. '

'I've never seen a game that got me so absorbed that I forgot my job. '

‘Although the game has some shortcomings, it doesn’t hurt, it’s just not that convenient. Compared with its advantages, it is completely negligible! '

‘The various mechanisms of the game are also very perfect, which shows that the developer has extremely rich experience in game production. '

‘In terms of playing experience, I seem to be really in the game world, attracted by the real environment inside, and even forget about it after get off work. '

'The difficulty of the game is moderate, and it didn't make me feel too desperate. Monsters have ways to deal with it, it's just up to you to find out. '

'Like I said, this is a masterpiece that I will never forget! It's not too much to give it full marks! '

Ah this

Players don't get it.

Who is telling the truth?

Why does the disadvantage mentioned by CA become an advantage when it comes to JM?

Especially the monster AI.

The former is said to be a headache, while the latter is said to be so smart that it is unimaginable.

So what does that mean?

What kind of monster is it?

Players don't know, but to be honest, players have different opinions on the shortcomings mentioned by CA.

It was originally a horror game, focusing on the fear of the unknown, the depression of the atmosphere, and the rendering of the environment.

You have the whole gun, and you make the gun so awesome, is that still called a horror game?

Therefore, it is only natural that the power of firearms becomes weaker.

Also, how did the random events that people like to talk about in "Mountain of the Sky" become something 'tiring' in CA?

Is it possible that the random events of "Control Failure" are not as interesting and rich as "Sky Mountain"?

Not to mention stealth, many players rely on stealth to hide ghosts and monsters in horror games.

Without stealth, it means that life is not guaranteed!

As for getting lost

It can only be said that the beholder sees benevolence!

Therefore, under these two highly polarized ratings, players continued to look down at the ratings of other players.

PO: 9.8 points

Comments: The game gives the common saving/loading settings the meaning of 'justified', which adds a lot of sense of substitution when playing.

KL: 9.6 points

Comments: Very interesting random events, people will not get bored, the setting of monsters also reflects the developer's ideas and creativity, the plot is very good.

UC: 9.4 points

GA: 9.2 points

SB: No score yet.

understood.

Players finally understand.

Amid the applause from the media, only CA Maverick gave a low score.

Then the meaning is already obvious.

For two reasons.

1. The money is not in place.

2. The reviewer is an 'intern' again.

It's just like using 'temporary workers' to cover up the crime after something happened in the country, it's just an excuse.

But CA, as an "authoritative" and "professional" media evaluation organization, is it so "obvious" shameless?

Shouldn't the score be changed again in a few days because of 'the money is in place'?

The players couldn't guess it, so they went to the Internet to find the CA reviewer who reviewed "Control Invalidation" this time.

Then it was discovered that he had been denounced and complained by overseas players on the Internet.

After a detailed understanding, it was discovered that this time the CA reviewer.

Is a person who mainly plays FPS cool games.

He gave a high score of 9.5 or more to "Battlefield Gunpowder", a FPS fast food game that is released every year.

The players suddenly realized.

This is an irresponsible review!

So, they followed the overseas players to denounce this CA reviewer who scored indiscriminately under the Youtube review video!

I have something to do tonight. I wish you all a happy Qixi Festival!