Disaster Artist

"Wise, sharp, light, sharp, alternate of the year."

"Lu Qian subtly implanted gender differences and the middle-class crisis under the shell of marriage for discussion, and the most brilliant and sharp point of the director is that he looks back at the traditional role of marriage from the standpoint of modern civilization, and further examines marriage. itself."

"It's calm and stormy. It's unimaginable that Lu Qian actually did it. The black humor throughout makes the audience feel a biting cold after they can't help but laugh."

"The movie is so weird and absurd, but that's why it's so amazing."

"This is the kind of work that really belongs to the cinema. Even after the movie is over, even if you leave the movie theater, it will be in your mind for a long, long time in the future, and it will make you and your partner or friends have a twisted and weird time. Talk, wait for the end of the conversation and realize that the same scene has already happened in the movie, and then I can’t help but want to go into the theater and watch it a second time.”

"Of course, the film provides different and diverse interpretations, but the real strength of Lu Qian is that he cuts into life from a voyeuristic perspective, yet makes the audience a part of it unknowingly."

"The avalanche is vivid and vivid. It really is the director's bad taste. The avalanche that did not happen at the physical level triggered a large-scale avalanche at the psychological level. The title of the movie immediately made sense."

"Wonderful! Wonderful! Wonderful! Amazing!"

Praise.

Praise.

Still praise.

There was a sound of praise. After the official screening of "Tourists" in the dome theater, all the comments from the media and audience were also online, leaving the environment of the film festival and really accepting the public's review—

Even if there is only one theater line for the time being.

Of course, it's not all praise, there are many calm voices.

"The movie is good, but it's not that good either. In fact, Lu Qian doesn't have any ambitions, he just wants to tell the story of a family. Except for the ending scene, it has nothing to do with the social structure, value system, etc., so there is no need to exaggerate. Lu Qian did show progress again, but he wasn't a master."

"In essence, it's actually a matter of marriage, and there are already many classic masterpieces with similar themes, and 'tourists' can't be squeezed into the first gear, but Lu Qian's cleverness lies in making fun of it in a dark humorous way. The entertainment effect of this story is worthy of recognition.”

"It's a drama movie, but it's still a horror movie in essence. Lu Qian still hasn't gotten rid of the stereotype of commercial narrative, but it is conceivable that the audience should have a collective climax."

Compared to the fanatical praise, the comments are sober and pertinent, and the reasons for both praise and criticism are intricate.

Part of it is really about the feeling of the movie.

Part of it is because of the "fall in expectations". Whether it's the momentum that Lu Qian had accumulated before, or the praise from Wei Hai and Seika, all of them have raised expectations to the throat, even if it's not "Master". It should also be a "masterpiece", and the final feeling will inevitably decline.

This is also an expected reaction.

In addition, there are also critical voices, even sneers—

Someone gave a stern rant of zero.

"Too bad, spoiler alert: no one was hurt. For the next two hours, nothing happened, period. Please save yourself a little time, do something else, you don't even go to the cinema. Nothing will be missed."

However, such comments are obviously grandstanding and have no comments on the movie. They just use gimmicks such as "blood" and "injury" to define a plot type movie, trying to win praise and controversy in this way, in the final analysis , just to criticize for the sake of criticism.

Not worth mentioning.

And, even if they exist, they are a minority, an absolute minority.

On the whole, fair reviews and praises have the upper hand.

But as expected, "The Tourist", a dark humor film focusing on middle-class life, is not easy for the general public to understand and resonate with.

Some people complained, "If I were that wife, wouldn't it be better to confront my husband directly? The middle class is hypocritical."

There are also people who are indifferent, "Tossing and turning is just worrying about those things, and there are people who sleep on the street hungry and panic when they are idle."

From this perspective, it is undoubtedly very, very difficult for "tourists" to win the recognition of more audiences.

At this point, commercial films have the limitations of commercial films, and art films are also troubled by art films, and the problem of "seeking a balance between art and business" has once again emerged.

It is precisely because of this that it is more and more rare for "tourists" to receive so much praise and affirmation.

"Lu Qian is a genius. He presented such a serious and profound topic in such a light and humorous way, and there were quite a few moments of laughter."

"When the movie is over, if you're stinged or provoked, whatever, you're stuck thinking, then it's a success, and if it's incomprehensible, that's okay, because that's a sign that middle-class life is really far from you. It's a little far away."

"There is no doubt that Lu Qian is bold, sharp, and direct, and he actually lifts the mask of middle-class hypocrisy like this. Obviously, he has no ambitions for awards season."

"I never imagined that the entertainment effect is so good! Lu Qian is indeed Lu Qian. Even discussing marriage and human nature reveals a kind of urchin joke."

"When people started arguing about this movie, Lu Qian had already succeeded. You know what? Now Lu Qian is probably watching the famous scene of dog bites dog from behind the computer screen. In a sense, it doesn't matter Isn't it another 'avalanche'?"

One hundred. Ninety-six points. Eighty-eight points. Ninety-three points.

Eighty-one points. Seventy-seven points. One hundred. Ninety-one points.

Eighty-five points. UU reading www.uukanshu.com seventy-three points. One hundred. Ninety-seven points.

Good reviews, a dazzling array, the highest score, a full seven full points; the lowest score, zero points, because there is only one solitary, even a failing score, so it is very abrupt, easily attracting all attention, so that other The reviews were all overshadowed.

And, more important than the score itself, the attention of the movie—

"Tourist" was only screened in a theater in the Dome Cinema, but it successfully broke into the top ten of the hot search list, and announced to the world with a gesture of being born:

Lu Qian's latest film has finally entered theaters, and audiences will soon be able to experience this work on the big screen in person.

The number of comments from professional media, delicacies and green bamboo all exploded in the first weekend, even not exceeding Lu Qian's previous two directorial works, setting new highs, and the attention of "tourists" can be felt in every aspect. degree, but all of these are not comparable to the hot search list.

Traffic, which should not belong to an awards season art film, is now actually happening to "tourists", which is the most shocking.