Ace Hollywood

Apart from "Pirates 2", "High School Musical" is the most nominated film in the list, which has also won numerous awards in major selection categories and popularity categories since the awards were presented. Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens were both shortlisted for the Best Actor and Actress awards, which can be said to have opened a very bright and splendid star path.

But the two popular nominations have an inseparable relationship with the dd film industry. Although "Pirates 2" is a Disney movie, Daniel has invested in and starred, not to mention "High School Musical", which is basically the topic of this year. The highest movie ever. The two works have such achievements, which are logically in the past, but some people are unwilling to reason.

"The nominations for the first 'Social Times Public Choice Awards' were announced recently. Among the film and annual awards, "Pirates of the Caribbean" and "High School Musical" shined brightly and were nominated for basically all awards. But many people questioned , Has the close relationship between the Public Choice Award and Daniel affected the fairness of the nomination?

The four social networks holding the Public Choice Awards are currently all invested by Plutos Investments, a subsidiary of Daniel. It can be said that they basically cover the vast majority of social network users, and the coverage rate exceeds the vast majority. similar awards. However, the difference of the Public Choice Award is that it does not open channels for the selection of one number one vote. Instead, it uses a data processing system to collect annual data on social networks to come up with a list.

According to the spokesperson of the award organizing committee, considering that the exposure of literary and artistic films will increase significantly during the awards season, the organizing committee has put forward a list of nominations, which will be nominated on January 27, one and a half months later. The final list of winners is published in the list to ensure that the awards cover more options.

However, such a mechanism has caused many people to worry that the organizing committee that masters this data processing system, although they claim to be supervised by personnel from accounting firms and competent government departments, still cannot avoid being considered as possible to perform manual operations.

On this year's nomination list, Daniel-related films have won big, which further exacerbated this concern. Daniel himself withdrew from the selection. It doesn't seem to have the effect of mitigating, because if it is Daniel himself nominated, it will cause less doubts - because he does have more influence and attention than others. "

"Variety" magazine has conducted a full analysis of this newly established award, which has always been known as a neutral and authoritative magazine. It's reasonable, and it didn't deliberately ignore a fact at the end.

"Of course, we need to note that this year, "Pirates 2" and "High School Musical" are indeed the two most talked about works. Blockbusters such as "x-man", "Superman Returns" and "Cars" all fall short. So If the awards weren't dominated by Daniel, people probably wouldn't have disagreed too much with the results.

Therefore, if we evaluate this nomination list from a more fair perspective, it should be said that it is an objective list. On the one hand, it has the characteristics of selection awards, which represent the tastes and tendencies of Internet users. The blindness and shallowness of some selection awards, Helen Mirren's shortlist is surprising and surprising.

Overall, the Public's Choice Awards and its ingenious mechanics. It may take more time to prove itself. "

Compared with "Variety"'s moderate point of view, Fox Cable Network is quite rude and unreasonable.

"The 'Public Choice Awards in the Social Times', which Daniel **** single-handedly established, aroused many doubts at the beginning of its establishment. One of them is. Existing popularity awards all have Internet selection channels. Is there any other way? The need for social networks to personally participate in the creation of a new Choice Award; the second point is that, as the person leading the award, Daniel is also a participant and investor in numerous films, which makes the general public doubt that the award can remain impartial; third Three points, the data management system claimed by the award organizing committee has not been proved credibly enough.

Yesterday, the organizing committee announced the list of nominations for the first public choice award. In the list, there are a series of works related to Daniel. "Pirates of the Caribbean 2", "High School Musical", "Invincible" and so on are all shortlisted. This fueled skepticism about the publicity of the awards.

Perhaps, Daniel **** and the award organizing committee should think carefully about how to ease their doubts, otherwise the "Public Choice Award in the Social Age" is likely to become a joke. "

……

As a public-facing award, the organizing committee cannot be as concerned about social concerns and public opinion as Daniel. Keep cool.

Soon, the organizing committee issued a statement saying that all nominations follow the facts, and I believe that all social network users feel it. The factors of the nominated actors in terms of exposure, influence, positive evaluation, social activity and other factors are the factors that make up the nomination. The list is based on the personal participation of website users. Therefore, the organizing committee believes that the list can represent social network users, that is, the public choice in the social age. Moreover, the organizing committee also noticed that ordinary users did not have obvious doubts or opposition to the nomination list, and support and recognition dominated the mainstream opinions. The organizing committee was deeply puzzled by the awards that some media intended to express~www. novelmt.com~ But I hope all walks of life can accommodate a newly born award. In the end, they did not forget to thank everyone for their support and promise to keep improving.

I have to say that it is a truth to travel the world with reason.

The organizing committee quickly grasped the key to solving the problem.

That is, the list does represent mainstream opinion, and although many of them are closely related to Daniel, it is undeniable that they are indeed representative - and, for the inaugural Public Choice Awards, the weight of each factor is still based on Exposure, mention rate, and activity are dominated by basic materials. Perhaps with the improvement of the credibility and influence of the awards, the weight of factors such as professional evaluations, movie ratings, and box office figures will gradually increase to increase the professionalism of the awards—this is also a long-term plan of the organizing committee.

The public may like to vote, but more important are professional and authoritative awards - such as the Oscars, the Union Awards, the Golden Globes. The Public Choice Award hopes to build itself into an authoritative award for both selection and professional categories, but it just needs to go through it step by step.

……

As a nascent award, the influence of the Public Choice Award cannot be considered small, but there is no way to compare it with the Oscar, so it was quickly overshadowed by the discussion about the Oscar. The Oscar nomination list is still far away, so guessing the list has become an endless job for everyone.

For the Public Choice Awards, while relieved, it is inevitable to feel a little lost - in Hollywood, any award will feel lost in front of the Oscars. (To be continued.)